Home Blog Page 97

Flu Myths and Legends: Mayo Clinic Expert Dispels 5 Common Flu Misconceptions

0

flu_duffyNewswise — ROCHESTER, Minn. — It seems you can’t go anywhere these days without hearing “the flu this” or “the flu that.” Unfortunately, this season’s influenza outbreak is one of the worst in years. And it’s not just the flu virus that’s causing problems; there are also many myths about the flu that are keeping people from doing more to prevent it. Mayo Clinic infectious diseases and vaccine expert Gregory Poland, M.D., dispels some of the most common:

MULTIMEDIA ALERT: A hand-washing demo with glow-in-the-dark germs and video clips of Dr. Poland are available for journalists to download on the Mayo Clinic News Network

Myth No. 1: Flu vaccines can give me the flu
False. Injectable flu vaccines are composed of pieces of inactivated flu proteins — and it’s impossible for them to “cause” flu. The nasal spray vaccine has live flu organisms weakened so they cannot multiply or cause disease.

Myth No. 2: Flu shots never work anyway, so why bother?
Also false. When there is a good match between the viruses causing disease and those in the vaccine, protection is excellent in otherwise healthy people. Protection is lower if you are unhealthy or in the frail elderly group. But vaccines are like seat belts: They are not perfect but they are the best protection we have against serious injury and death.

Myth No. 3: Flu vaccines are dangerous, especially for pregnant women
Also false. Concerns about pregnant women getting vaccinated began when women were advised not to get any kind of vaccination during pregnancy, Dr. Poland says. Today’s flu vaccines are safe for expectant mothers and highly recommended. A recent large study demonstrated significant increases in maternal death among unvaccinated women infected with influenza. However, because they have not been studied in pregnant women, pregnant women should stay away from nasal flu vaccines, which do contain live, weakened flu virus, Dr. Poland says.

Myth No. 4: It’s too late to get vaccinated
Again, false. While it’s always better to get vaccinated before flu season begins — it can take about two weeks for the vaccination to take full effect — it’s never too late to get a flu vaccine, Dr. Poland says. Even if you didn’t get vaccinated and caught the flu, get a flu vaccine to protect yourself against the other strains that are circulating, Dr. Poland says.

Myth No. 5: It’s just the flu. What’s the big deal?
Once again, false. While it might be “just” the flu, Dr. Poland says we should still be concerned, regardless of our age or physical condition. In an average year, up to 40,000 Americans die from influenza and its complications, and over 250,000 are hospitalized. Millions are sick, miss school, work, and important events and spend money on over-the-counter “cold remedies.” Complications and death are particularly frequent in infants and young children, those with chronic medical conditions, the elderly, pregnant women and people who are obese. Health care providers also should get immunized to prevent spreading flu to vulnerable patients, Dr. Poland says.

“No one should confuse influenza with a “minor illness.” Serious complications and death result every year due to flu. Vaccines, while imperfect, offer the best protection available for you and your family, as well as others you come in contact with,” says Dr. Poland, the Mary Lowell Leary Professor of Medicine and director of the Vaccine Research Group at Mayo Clinic.

Dr. Poland offers these tips for sidestepping illness:
*Wash your hands thoroughly and frequently with soap and warm water or alcohol-based hand sanitizer, particularly before leaving a restroom, eating or touching your face. Wash your hands for about 20 seconds, about as long as it takes to sing “Happy Birthday.” When visiting a public restroom, use a paper towel to turn off the faucet and open the door when leaving.
*Keep your vaccines up to date: Besides the seasonal flu shot, the most important ones include the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella and a relatively new vaccine called Tdap, for tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis, or whooping cough.
*Don’t smoke: It can make you more susceptible to illness in general.
*Be an advocate for your health: If someone near you is ill, move away or ask to be reseated, if you can. If a server’s hands touch your food or the rim of your glass, don’t be embarrassed or hesitant about asking for a new serving or moving on and eating elsewhere.
To interview Dr. Poland or other Mayo Clinic flu experts, please contact Mayo Clinic Public Affairs at 507-284-5005 (days), 507-284-2511 (evenings) or via email at newsbureau@mayo.edu.
###
About Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic is a nonprofit worldwide leader in medical care, research and education for people from all walks of life. For more information, visit http://www.mayoclinic.org/about and www.mayoclinic.org/news.

Common Erectile Dysfunction Drug Not Helpful for Heart Failure Patients

0

images (1)Newswise — SAN FRANCISCO — A commonly used erectile dysfunction drug, sildenafil, doesn’t help patients who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a condition in which the heart’s lower chambers are stiff and cannot relax and fill fully between beats. That is the finding of the RELAX study, presented today at the American College of Cardiology’s 62nd Annual Scientific Session and simultaneously published in The Journal of the American Medical Association. The study’s lead author called the results disappointing.

Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, had shown encouraging results in smaller studies and in animal models.

In this study, researchers looked at the drug’s effect on maximum exercise ability as assessed by peak oxygen consumption and on how far people could walk in six minutes, their clinical status and their heart structure and function. They found no benefit, says lead author Margaret Redfield, M.D., heart failure specialist and researcher at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.

“It was surprising and a disappointment, and it was contradictory to our hypothesis,” says Dr. Redfield. “There are few options for help for these patients, and we hoped we would find something.”

When the heart does not pump blood well, heart failure symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue and weakness can result.

The RELAX study is the first multicenter trial to look at the effect of therapy with sildenafil on this condition, also known as diastolic heart failure. The study was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of 216 stable outpatients with heart failure (with an ejection fraction of greater than 50 percent) with reduced exercise capacity; the median age was 69. Participants were enrolled during a
3.5-year period from the nine U.S. centers including Mayo Clinic that make up the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network and 17 other centers in the United States and Canada.

“This was a very complex study and criteria for study participants were very strict,” Dr. Redfield says. “But it’s most likely that we didn’t see the results we hoped for because this type of heart failure just does not respond to this drug.”

The RELAX study was funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant HL84907 (original) and grant HL110262 (this grant cycle). The institute also funds the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network.

Sequestration Cuts Medicare Reimbursement Beginning April 1

0

imagesNewswise — The federal budget sequester went into effect March 1 after a lack of Congressional action to avoid the automatic spending cuts. Effective April 1, Medicare payments to hospitals, doctors, and other health care providers will be reduced by 2%.

In the weeks leading up to the March 1 deadline, the Senate twice voted down proposals to halt the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts to government programs. Their lack of agreement on a deficit-reduction policy was followed by the signing of an executive order to initiate broad cuts to government spending.

The sequestration order directs government agencies, including Medicare, to cut their budgets. Most cuts to federal agencies and programs will not begin overnight—some agencies will have until October 1 to determine where to cut spending. However, it’s anticipated that Medicare providers will see the impact of sequestration by mid-April. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will implement the 2% cut, reimbursing Medicare claims at 98 cents on the dollar. A CMS spokesperson anticipates that the sequester reductions will result in $11 billion in lost revenue to Medicare doctors, hospitals, and other providers.

Specific details of the Medicare sequester have not yet been made public, including: Whether the 2% cut will be applied to allowed charges under the Medicare physician fee schedule (and so affect beneficiary copayments); If the 2% cut will be applied only to the physician’s Medicare claims payment; Whether the cuts will be applied to claims with a date of service on or after April 1, or to all claims payments made on or after April 1.

In a statement released on March 1, American Medical Association President Jeremy Lazarus said, “Both Medicare beneficiaries and providers will feel real pain from the cuts. Sequestration will widen the already enormous gap between what Medicare pays and the actual cost of caring for seniors.”

Congress and the president could halt some or all of the spending cuts, but it may take a surge of public indignation to motivate them to do so. Members of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) have been encouraged to contact their elected officials to share their concerns over the impending cuts, which come on the heels of a significant decrease in Medicare reimbursement for EDX services.

Outbreaks, Epidemics and Pandemics—What You Need to Know

0

image.phpNewswise — What is an outbreak?
An outbreak is a sudden rise in the number of cases of a disease. An outbreak may occur in a community or geographical area, or may affect several countries. It may last for a few days or weeks, or even for several years.

Some outbreaks are expected each year, such as influenza. Sometimes a single case of an infectious disease may be considered an outbreak. This may be true if the disease is rare (e.g., foodborne botulism) or has serious public health implications (e.g., bioterrorism agent such as anthrax).

What is an epidemic?
An epidemic occurs when an infectious disease spreads rapidly to many people. In 2003, the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic took the lives of nearly 800 people worldwide.

What is a pandemic?
A pandemic is a global disease outbreak. It differs from an outbreak or epidemic because it:
•affects a wider geographical area, often worldwide.
•infects a greater number of people than an epidemic.
•is often caused by a new virus or a strain of virus that has not circulated among people for a long time. Humans usually have little to no immunity against it. The virus spreads quickly from person-to-person worldwide.
•causes much higher numbers of deaths than epidemics.
•often creates social disruption, economic loss, and general hardship.

The influenza (flu) pandemic of 1918-1919 killed between 20 and 40 million people. It is one of the most devastating pandemics in recorded world history. 2009 H1N1 influenza was a more recent global pandemic.

While an influenza pandemic is rare, they do reoccur periodically. Some pandemics are worse than others.

Public health experts say it’s not a matter of IF a flu pandemic will happen, but WHEN. It is essential to be prepared.

Pandemic preparation
Here are a few things you can do:
•Plan ahead in case services are disrupted. This is especially important if someone in your family has special needs. For example, make sure to have a way to fill needed prescriptions.
•Make a list of important contacts for home, school, and work.
•Talk with your neighbors, workplace, and school about how to plan for staying home if you or your household members are sick.
•Buy and store at least two weeks’ supplies of food, water, medicine, and facemasks.
•Stay as healthy as you can by getting adequate rest, managing stress, eating right, and continuing to exercise.

Making plans now will help you to be ready for the next flu pandemic.

Freedom of (some) information: US ‘national security’ hampers data access

0
Image from corporatewelfare.org
Image from corporatewelfare.org

Despite President Obama’s promise that openness will prevail, America’s government agencies continue to tighten their grip over free public access of state documents, AP reports. Papers are mostly being censored to conform to the security policy.

America’s Freedom of Information Act has been increasingly sacrificed for the sake of national security, revealed the latest analyses of the Associated Press.

Having examined the annual document workflow of the 33 federal government agencies, the Associated Press concluded that just over a third of the private requests applied to US government agencies in 2012 were turned down altogether for various reasons, the most common of which are matters of national security.

In some cases the requested records could not be found, while in others the requests were determined improper or the requestor refused to pay for the copies.

A considerable part of the remaining nearly two-thirds of the requests that were finally handed over to the applicants had been either preliminarily censored or selectively curtailed.

White House spokesman Eric Schultz reported of great effort the government agencies have demonstrated responsiveness in 2012 to “the president’s call for greater transparency.”

Though the administration has answered a record number of requests in 2012, still matters of the national security withheld information in at least 5,223 cases in 2012, a sudden increase from 4,243 cases in 2011 (and even fewer – 3,805 cases – during  Obama’s first year in office).

The US State Department answered just 57 per cent of its requests, a dramatic fall from 75 per cent in 2011.

Up to 60 per cent of 3,586 requests applied to the CIA were either censored or withheld (49 per cent in 2011).

The Pentagon’s National Security Agency monitoring internet traffic and phone calls worldwide follows closely with 2,390 denials last year.

Read the whole story…

New record: 15 percent of Americans on food stamps

0
Joe Raedle / Getty Images / AFP
Joe Raedle / Getty Images / AFP

Government dependability is continuing to rise, with a record-breaking number of Americans enrolled to receive food stamps. The latest USDA report shows that 47.8 million Americans, which make up 15 percent of the country, are receiving the benefits.

The US Department of Agriculture has announced that 47.79 million people were enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in December, which is up from the 46.61 million who were enrolled at the end of 2011.

Most of these individuals lived in Texas – the state with the highest average of monthly participants, which was 4.04 million in 2012. California had 3.96 million participants and Florida had 3.35 million. The numbers are high, but reasonable, since those states are among the top four most populated in the US. But Washington, DC has the highest ratio of food stamp users. With a population of 617,996 and 141,147 SNAP participants, about 23 percent of city residents were dependent on food stamps in 2012. Texas falls close to the national average, with 15.5 percent of its residents eligible to receive the assistance.

But with an increase of 1.18 million SNAP users in a year and a federal budget deficit expected to hit about $845 billion this year, the rising number of Americans on food stamps simply adds to the costs.

“We spend a trillion dollars each year on federal poverty programs. That’s more than the budget for Social Security or Defense,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, during his weekly address.“But poverty seems only to increase. Something is wrong. Compassion demands that we change.”

Referencing data that shows one in three Washington DC children living in poverty, two thirds of which live in single parent homes, Sessions discussed a problem that is only getting worse.

“Americans are committed to helping our sisters and brothers who are struggling, but we are seeing the damaging human consequences of our broken welfare state,” he added.

But the rise in food stamp users is not a new dilemma. Last Thanksgiving, a record-breaking 13 percent of Americans spent the holiday season relying on the SNAP program. During the fiscal year 2011, nearly 20 million children – a quarter of all US children – were being fed with food stamps.  And the number of food stamp users has been creeping up every month, as millions of Americans continue to sink into poverty.

All-time records continue to be broken, and news agencies have largely stopped reporting on the rise in food stamps each month.

As unemployment once again dropped last week, reaching 7.7 percent, the rise in SNAP enrollment is another disheartening economic indicator about the state of the US economy.